Clarifying data verification
I need to caution about using a reliable database to confirm information. We can compile data from official sources like Bundesliga.com or Opta, provided we have network access. Since the earlier instructions allow for network tasks, it would be smart to check with the user first. Should I verify or prepare a formatted post? Also, would they prefer a short summary first? I can explain [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;帽子戏法[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; as three goals in a single match. Do they want full rankings or an infographic?
这是个很有意思的数据点。你希望我做哪件事？
\n
- 核实并补全“德甲最快达成10次帽子戏法”的完整榜单（附权威来源/口径说明）
- 做一版易读的榜单表（CSV/Markdown），便于发布
- 写一段社媒/稿件文案（标题+导语+要点）
- 做个简短的数据解读：口径含义、与其他联赛对比、凯恩与盖德-穆勒的历史位置
另外确认两点：
\n
- “最快”是按“出场场次最少达到第10次帽子戏法”来定义吗？
- 你有指定的数据来源吗（Bundesliga/Opta/Transfermarkt）？如果没有，我按官方与Opta口径去核对。
\n